SAQ 450 – Respiratory – spontaneous pneumothorax management and analgesia
Model Answer
Respiratory – spontaneous pneumothorax management and analgesia.
a. Positive finding
- Large right-sided pneumothorax with visible pleural line and absent peripheral lung markings; the lung is collapsed medially.
b. Negative findings
- No clear tension features such as marked mediastinal shift or diaphragmatic depression.
- No pleural effusion, rib fracture or traumatic chest wall injury evident on this image.
c. Treatment options
| Treatment | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Observation with oxygen and repeat imaging | Least invasive; appropriate for small or minimally symptomatic pneumothorax. | Slow resolution; unsuitable if large, symptomatic, hypoxic or unreliable follow-up. |
| Needle aspiration | Less invasive than a chest drain; may avoid admission if successful. | Failure/recurrence is common; may still require chest drain and repeat procedures. |
| Intercostal catheter/chest drain, preferably small-bore Seldinger if appropriate | Reliable re-expansion for large or symptomatic pneumothorax; allows ongoing air-leak management. | Painful/invasive; risks bleeding, infection, organ injury and admission. |
| Surgical/VATS referral if persistent air leak or recurrence | Definitive recurrence prevention. | Not first-line for uncomplicated first presentation; requires theatre and specialist care. |
d. Analgesia options
| Approach | Pro | Con |
|---|---|---|
| Oral analgesia such as paracetamol/NSAID if safe | Simple and avoids IV opioid adverse effects. | May be inadequate for severe pain and NSAIDs may be contraindicated. |
| Titrated IV opioid | Rapidly effective and titratable. | Can cause sedation, nausea, hypotension or respiratory depression. |
| Local anaesthetic infiltration or regional technique for drain insertion | Targets procedural pain and can reduce opioid need. | Requires skill, takes time and has local anaesthetic toxicity/failure risks. |
Comments are closed for this SAQ.